Contract Templates vs Bespoke Drafting: What Hospitality Employers Actually Need
A free template gets you started. A solicitor charges hundreds for bespoke drafting that goes out of date in twelve months. There is a middle ground — and for most hospitality employers, it is the right answer.
Leon Mclean
Co-founder, Birchlow · Last reviewed July 2026
Employment contracts occupy an uncomfortable space in the small hospitality business. Every employer knows they need them. Most employers know their current ones are not quite right. Very few do anything about it because the choice appears to be between a free template that may or may not be up to date, and paying a solicitor several hundred pounds for a document that will be out of date in twelve months.
Both options are real. But neither is the complete answer for most hospitality businesses. This guide explains the trade-offs and sets out what most restaurant, pub and cafe owners actually need.
The problem with free templates
A free employment contract template from a business association, an accountant's website, or a basic legal directory has one significant advantage: it costs nothing. The disadvantage is more significant: it is static.
Employment law changes every year. National Minimum Wage rates change each April. SSP rates change each April. Statutory pay rates for maternity, paternity, parental and bereavement leave change each April. Day-one rights expanded significantly from April 2026. The January 2026 exclusivity clause ban requires changes to zero-hours contracts. The anticipated 2027 guaranteed-hours reform will require further changes.
A template downloaded in 2024 and used without review today contains at minimum three sets of changes it does not reflect: the April 2025 statutory rate updates, the April 2026 day-one rights changes, and the January 2026 exclusivity clause ban. Any employee who receives that contract is being given incorrect information about their entitlements.
The practical consequences of an out-of-date contract are not always immediate. Employees often do not notice that their contract references a three-day SSP waiting period that no longer applies. But when a dispute arises, that incorrect contract becomes evidence that you were not operating the employment relationship correctly, and it can affect how a tribunal views your conduct.
The second problem with generic templates is that they are not written for hospitality. They typically assume a fixed-hours, permanent, full-time employment relationship. The reality of staffing in a restaurant or pub is much more varied: zero-hours casual workers, fixed-term seasonal staff, part-time roles that vary week to week, bank staff who may or may not have a regular pattern. A single generic template applied to all of these is a compromise that serves none of them well.
When bespoke drafting is worth it
There are situations where paying for a solicitor to draft your employment contracts is the right decision.
Restrictive covenants that matter commercially. If you have a head chef whose client relationships, supplier contacts, or culinary reputation are genuinely commercially valuable, a post-termination restriction that prevents them from working for a competitor or setting up in competition nearby may be worth protecting properly. Restrictive covenants are only enforceable if they are reasonable in scope and duration, and a well-drafted restriction that has been specifically considered for the role is more defensible than a generic clause copied from a template.
Senior or unusual hires. A general manager with a stake in the business, a head of operations across multiple sites, or any hire where the terms have been individually negotiated benefits from a contract that reflects the specific arrangement rather than a standard template with overwritten fields.
Complex arrangements. An employer who operates a tronc scheme, shares tips through a particular mechanism, or has unusual holiday arrangements that depart from the statutory default in a lawful way needs contract terms that accurately describe those arrangements.
For standard waiting staff, kitchen staff, bar staff, and front-of-house roles on conventional terms, bespoke legal drafting for each hire is disproportionate. The contract requirements are straightforward. What matters is that the terms are correct and up to date.
What hospitality employers actually need
For a restaurant, pub, cafe or hotel managing a team of mostly hourly-paid, mixed-hours staff, the contract requirements are:
Accuracy. The contract must state the correct legal entitlements at the time it is issued. Not what was correct in 2023. What is correct now. This means the April 2026 day-one rights must be reflected. SSP must not reference waiting days. Zero-hours contracts must not contain exclusivity clauses.
Multiple variants. A permanent full-time contract is not the same as a zero-hours contract, which is not the same as a fixed-term seasonal contract. Each arrangement type needs its own template that reflects the actual nature of the engagement.
Prompt updating. When the law changes, the template must change with it. A contract that states the wrong statutory entitlement is not a neutral document. It gives incorrect information to employees and creates an evidential problem in any subsequent dispute.
Practical clauses. The contract should include the clauses that are specifically useful in a hospitality context: a clause addressing tips and tronc arrangements, if applicable; a right to require a food safety certificate or allergen training; clarity about the use of uniforms and equipment; and probation terms that give the employer practical flexibility in the first weeks of employment.
The middle ground: a contract that updates itself
The practical solution for most hospitality employers is a contract template that is maintained against current legislation, covers the specific arrangements common in the sector, and is updated when the law changes without requiring the employer to track each legislative development and edit the document manually.
This is the approach Birchlow takes with its COTA contract system. Rather than issuing a static document that you then need to maintain yourself, COTA generates contracts whose terms are connected to current legislation. When a statutory rate changes or a new right is introduced, the connection to current law is updated. You are not relying on a document drafted in 2023 and hoping it still reflects the law in 2026.
The model sits between the two inadequate options. It is not a free template that requires annual manual review to remain compliant. It is not a bespoke legal document costing several hundred pounds per hire. It is a maintained, sector-specific starting point that reflects the law as it stands, not as it stood when the template was last touched.
For a hospitality business issuing ten, twenty or fifty new contracts a year to a rotating workforce, this approach makes the compliance overhead manageable rather than something that accumulates as a liability until a dispute crystallises it.
Two-minute check
Do you know where your business is actually exposed?
The Birchlow risk assessment asks five questions and tells you exactly which Employment Rights Act 2025 changes affect your business right now. No email required to start.
Take the free assessmentFree employer resources
Need the full written warning pack?
The Birchlow Written Warning Template Pack includes four ready-to-use letters: invitation to hearing, first written warning, final written warning, and letter of dismissal. Free to download.
Get the free template packRelated guides
- →Employment contracts and written particulars for hospitality employers: the complete guide
- →Written statement of employment particulars: what must be included
- →April 2026 day-one rights: what changed in your contracts
- →How to write an employment contract UK
- →Guaranteed hours: what the 2027 reform means for hospitality rotas